MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087785709 · doi:10.1159/000170039

Studies on Lymphatic Drainage of the Peritoneal Cavity in Sheep

2008· article· en· W2087785709 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Purification · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphatic systemPeritoneal cavityLymphThoracic ductMedicineAlbuminLymphatic vesselLymph ductPathologyAnatomyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the sheep, it is possible to cannulate several of the lymphatics that drain the peritoneal cavity and assess lymphatic drainage of this serous space directly. Indwelling catheters were placed in the caudal mediastinal and thoracic ducts. The right lymph duct could not be cannulated. Lymphatic drainage of the peritoneal cavity based on the movement of 125I-albumin from the cavity into the lymph compartments was not affected by the osmolality of the dialysate but was markedly altered by anesthesia. In addition, lymphatic drainage was assessed from the disappearance of instilled 125I-albumin from the peritoneal cavity and from the appearance of intraperitoneally administered 125I-albumin in the bloodstream and compared with data from the cannulated preparations. Lymph flows derived from tracer movement into the cannulated lymph compartments and from the appearance of tracer in the bloodstream were very similar. However, calculations of lymph flows based on the disappearance of tracer from the peritoneal cavity appeared to overestimate lymphatic drainage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it