Light environment and crown architecture of two temperate <i>Vaccinium</i> species: inherent growth rules versus degree of plasticity in light response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Light environment and crown architecture were investigated in two closely related species (deciduous Vaccinium hirtum and evergreen Vaccinium bracteatum) in a young and an old secondary forest. Light environment was determined by photographic estimation of light above ramets (30500 cm tall). Crown architecture was examined to determine the effects of ramet age and light level on several architectural traits. In the young secondary forest, both species were mainly found in large gaps. In the old secondary forest, V. bracteatum persisted in deep shade, whereas V. hirtum was concentrated in small gaps. Vaccinium hirtum had narrower crowns and thinner stems than V. bracteatum, indicating lower structural costs in V. hirtum. Older ramets had greater total shoot extension (only V. bracteatum) and shorter length of the current-year shoots (markedly so in V. hirtum) than younger ramets. In higher light levels, V. bracteatum had greater aboveground growth and higher leaf area indices, whereas V. hirtum had only greater flowering intensity. Architectural traits were highly correlated with ramet age in V. hirtum, whereas these were mainly affected by light in V. bracteatum, indicating higher architectural plasticity in the latter species. The differences in architecture and its plasticity can be relevant for the segregation of light habitats between the species.Key words: light environment, crown architecture, leaf display, morphological plasticity, current-year shoot.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".