In Vivo Antitumor Activity of ZYD88, a Chinese Herbal Medicine, in Animal Models with S180 Sarcoma and Ehrlich Tumor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cancer is a leading cause of death in the world. The continuous development of effective and nontoxic therapeutic agents is a major task in the battle of cancer. We report the in vivo effects of a Chinese herbal medicine, ZYD88, on the inhibition of tumor growth in an S(180) xenograft animal model and the improvement of animal survival in the Ehrlich tumor model. Oral administration of ZYD88 in mice with the xenograft S(180) sarcoma significantly inhibited tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, ZYD88 given to the animals with Ehrlich ascitic tumors by gavage significantly prolonged the life span compared with that of animals treated with saline. In both animal models, the effects of ZYD88 were comparable to those of a standard chemotherapeutic agent, cyclophosphamide, although it had few side effects. These results clearly demonstrated the in vivo anticancer activity of ZYD88 in two different animal models and suggest that ZYD88 is a potential agent for the clinical management of cancer and warrants further preclinical and clinical investigations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".