MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087849587 · doi:10.1103/physreve.73.066602

Joint time-frequency and finite-difference time-domain analysis of precursor fields in dispersive media

2006· article· en· W2087849587 on OpenAlexafffund
Reza Safian, Costas D. Sarris, Mohammad Mojahedi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum optics and atomic interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSuperluminal motionFinite-difference time-domain methodPhysicsPulse (music)Causality (physics)Electromagnetic pulseGroup velocityTransient (computer programming)Field (mathematics)Electromagnetic fieldSpeed of light (cellular automaton)Time domainOpticsComputational physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Superluminal group velocities, defined as group velocities exceeding the speed of light in vacuum, c, have been theoretically predicted and experimentally observed in various types of dispersive media, such as passive and active Lorentzian media, one-dimensional photonic crystals, and undersized waveguides. Though superluminal group velocities have been found in these media, it has been suggested that the pulse "front" and associated transient field oscillations, known as the precursors or forerunners, will never travel faster than c, and hence relativistic causality is always preserved. Until now, few rigorous studies of these transient fields in structures exhibiting superluminal group velocities have been performed. In this paper, we present the dynamic evolution of these earliest field oscillations in one-dimensional photonic crystals (1DPC), using finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) techniques in conjunction with joint time-frequency analysis (JTFA). Our study clearly shows that the precursor fields associated with superluminal pulse propagation travel at subluminal speeds, and thus, the arrival of these precursor fields must be associated with the arrival of "genuine information." Our study demonstrates the expected result that abnormal group velocities do not contradict Einstein causality. This work also shows that FDTD analysis and JTFA can be combined to study the dynamic evolution of the transient and steady state pulse propagation in dispersive media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicQuantum optics and atomic interactionsFrench-language works237,207