MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087850209 · doi:10.1177/108128650100600504

Interior Cracking of a Circular Inclusion with Imperfect Interface under Thermal Loading

2001· article· en· W2087850209 on OpenAlexaff
William Amenyah, Peter Schiavone, C. Q. Ru, A. Mioduchowski

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Solids · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenstrainStress intensity factorMaterials scienceClassification of discontinuitiesMechanicsStress fieldFracture mechanicsDiscontinuity (linguistics)Heaviside step functionBoundary value problemComposite materialStructural engineeringMathematical analysisFinite element methodMathematicsResidual stressPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A semi-analytic solution is developed to determine the effect of an imperfect interface on the stress field inside a circular elastic inclusion containing a preexisting interior radial crack, subjected to thermal loading. The inclusion is surrounded by an infinite matrix of different elastic material with the inclusion- matrix interface assumed to be homogeneously imperfect. This is characterized by continuity of tractions and discontinuity of displacements across the interface. Using complex variable methods, we derive series representations of the corresponding stress functions both inside the circular inclusion and in the surrounding matrix. The governing boundary value problem is then formulated in such a way that these stress functions simultaneously satisfy the traction-free condition along the crack face, the imperfect interface conditions, and the prescribed asymptotic conditions. The thermal load is modeled by a prescribed volume eigenstrain which characterizes the stress-free thermal strain of the inclusion. The method is illustrated for a number of crack-inclusion geometries and shear moduli ratios (of inclusion to matrix). We present explicit values of the stress intensity factor at the crack tips. These results can be used to ascertain the direction of initial crack propagation in, for example, fiber-reinforced composites or in components subjected to thermal loading in microelectronic packaging. To demonstrate the accuracy of the results obtained in this paper, we draw comparisons with corresponding cases documented in the literature where analytical results are available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics and Mechanics of SolidsSame topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207