High frequency of exon deletions and putative founder effects in French Canadian Lynch syndrome families
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is one of the most common autosomal dominantly inherited cancer syndromes. Mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 account for greater than 98% of reported mutations in Lynch syndrome families. It has been reported that large genomic deletions in MLH1 and MSH2 are a frequent cause of Lynch syndrome in certain populations. Using a multimodal approach, we have identified mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in French Canadian families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria for Lynch syndrome and who displayed abnormal staining for at least one of the Lynch syndrome proteins. Mutations were identified in 28 of our 29 French Canadian probands (97%). A total of 18 distinct mutations (nine in MLH1, seven in MSH2, two in MSH6) were identified, of which six (33%) were genomic exon deletions. Another four (22%) resulted in exon deletions in cDNA alone. Three (17%) are novel mutations. Five of these 18 mutations were detected in more than one distinct family (four in MLH1, one in MSH2) and haplotype analysis suggests the possibility of founder effects. Fifteen of the 29 (52%) families carried one of these five putative founder mutations. These findings may simplify genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in French Canadians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".