MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087919337 · doi:10.1139/b10-042

Light regulation of endogenous salicylic acid levels in hypocotyls of <i>Helianthus annuus</i> seedlings

2010· article· en· W2087919337 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Leonid V. Kurepin, Linda Walton, David M. Reid, C. C. Chinnappa

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHelianthus annuusBiologyHypocotylFar-redBotanyEndogenySalicylic acidSunflowerHorticultureIrradianceCanopyBiochemistryRed light

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plants growing in canopy shade typically exhibit increased stem elongation and reduced leaf growth. This is as a result of direct interactions between plant photoreceptors sensing the change (reduction) in the ratio of red to far-red (R/FR) light and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and plant hormones, and regulating these morphological traits. The effect of the varying light conditions found in shade on endogenous salicylic acid (SA) content was tested, and the possible role of SA in shade avoidance by sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) hypocotyls was examined. A logarithmic increase in PAR irradiance levels increased endogenous SA levels roughly 10-fold. Separation of individual light wavelengths (R, FR, and blue) constituting the PAR irradiance of sunlight, established that only FR light had significant and positive effects on endogenous SA levels. Further, a low R/FR ratio significantly increased the endogenous SA content in hypocotyls compared with normal and high R/FR ratios. Uncoupling the effect of R/FR ratio and PAR irradiance on endogenous SA content demonstrated that PAR irradiance is a much stronger signal than FR light-enrichment. Thus, while a low R/FR ratio increases the SA content in sunflower hypocotyls, low PAR, the other component of canopy shade, decreases the SA content much more effectively than low R/FR ratio increases it. Therefore, it appears that SA probably has no direct role in shade avoidance effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207