MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087939453 · doi:10.1139/v09-165

Using the nitro group to induce π-stacking in terthiophenes

2010· article· en· W2087939453 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Wendy A. Sears, Craig D. MacKinnon, Robert C. Mawhinney, Lauren C. Sinnemaki, Matthew Johnson, A. John Winter, Craig M. Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLakehead University
KeywordsChemistryStackingIntermolecular forceNitroHydrogen bondCrystal structureCrystallographyGroup (periodic table)PlanarSolid-stateCrystal (programming language)Computational chemistryStereochemistryMoleculePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new synthetic route to mononitrated oligothiophenes is described, as well as the preparation of halogenated derivatives (Br, I) thereof. An unusual deep red colour is observed and explained, with the aid of DFT calculations, as arising from a significant quinoidal contribution to the molecular structure. The crystal structures of two compounds, H(C4H2S)3NO2 and Br(C4H2S)3NO2, are presented. Both compounds have planar sheets held together by intermolecular short contacts (hydrogen bonds and, for the latter, NO2···Br interactions); the sheets do not directly superimpose, so the effect of the π-stacking is not maximized. Solid-state fluorescence and extended-Hückel band-structure calculations are also presented for these materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsFrench-language works237,207