Specifics in running kinematics developed by Pose Method in disabled sprinters with cerebral palsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The absence of a commonly accepted theory of running technique and teaching methods creates certain practical and theoretical difficulties in the training of athletes of all levels. This particularly concerns disabled athletes who specialise in running. The absence of an established standard in running technique makes it difficult for runners diagnosed with cerebral palsy to learn an effective and reliable running technique in order to build up a foundation for developing sport performance skill and to reduce injuries. Hypothesis: Disabled runners affected by cerebral palsy can experience changes in running technique similar to those of healthy runners by learning to run with the Pose Method. Objective: The purpose of this study was to find specifics in kinematics of disabled runners learning the Pose Method, and to compare them to the specifics in kinematics of healthy runners learning the Pose Method. Data sources: To conduct the comparative analysis of kinematics, data of healthy runners were gathered from two Pose Method studies published in International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, and International Quarterly of Sport Science. Data of runners with cerebral palsy were obtained by conducting a new study with parameters and criteria similar to the published studies. Results: Six out of eight characteristics in changes in kinematics of disabled runners learning the Pose Method were similar to the changes in kinematics of healthy runners learning the Pose Method. Conclusions: The data indicates that teaching the runners with cerebral palsy symptoms to run using the Pose Method leads to less deviations from the optimal parameters of running technique, making it a better controlled process. Further research is required to find out the effect of these changes in running kinematics on speed, performance, and injury reduction in runners with disabilities. Clinical relevance: These data provide an insight into the potential of development of better sensory structure of movement of individuals diagnosed with cerebral palsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".