MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088032516 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100004078

Hyaline Body Myopathy: Adulthood Manifestations

2005· article· en· W2088032516 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mubeen F. Rafay, William Halliday, Vera Bril

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyalinePathologyMyopathyMedicineMuscle hypertrophyMuscle weaknessAnatomyWeaknessInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hyaline body myopathy (HBM) is a rare chronic nonprogressive congenital myopathy, with variable patterns of inheritance. METHODS: We describe a patient with congenital HBM with progression of weakness and increasing muscle pain in adulthood. Three muscle biopsies, done at various times in her life, are reported. RESULTS: Symptoms started during childhood; however, as an adult, following a period of stability with no progression of the disease, the patient became symptomatic with worsening proximal limb weakness, severe aching pain and hypertrophy of calves. Moderate elevations of serum creatine kinase and myopathic features were noted on electrophysiologic testing. Muscle pathology showed significant fatty infiltration of skeletal muscle and increased number of fibers with internal nuclei. Histology demonstrated the presence of subsarcolemmal, well-delineated hyaline areas, which on histochemical studies was shown to be limited to typel fibers. The hyaline bodies were dark with pH 4.2 ATPase and with immunohistochemical studies reacted only with myosin heavy chain slow. Electron microscopy showed the hyaline bodies to be composed of nonmembrane bound, fairly even sized granular material, which merged with the adjacent myofibrils. Earlier muscle biopsies, done during childhood, also revealed presence of similar subsarcolemmal hyaline deposits. CONCLUSION: There appears to be a pattern of presentation with adulthood progression in HBM, which has not been described before. Further case studies are required to understand the clinical progression in HBM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicInflammatory Myopathies and DermatomyositisFrench-language works237,207