MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088065282 · doi:10.4141/p01-134

Selection for drought resistance in early generations of common bean populations

2002· article· en· W2088065282 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Henry Terán, Shree P. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhaseolusBiologyCultivarDrought tolerancePopulationIrrigationYield (engineering)AgronomyGrowing seasonDrought resistanceSelection (genetic algorithm)MonocultureHorticultureDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Availability and use of high-yielding drought-resistant common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars would reduce dependence on irrigation water and production costs, stabilize yield in drought-prone environments, and potentially increase profit margins for growers. Among various selection criteria, seed yield has been found to be the most effective to improve drought resistance in common bean. Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of selection for seed yield in drought-stressed (DS) and non-stressed (NS) environments in early generations of common bean populations under field conditions. One hundred thirty-four F 2 -derived F 4 (F 2:4 ) families from each of three double-cross populations (SX 12008, SX 12009, and SX 12010), four parents, and six checks were evaluated in replicated field trials in DS and NS environments at the Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Palmira, Colombia during the January to March growing season (1997A). The 30 highest yielding F 2:5 families from each population and each environment, four parents, and two checks were again evaluated in replicated trials in their respective DS and NS environments during the June to August growing season (1997B). Three F 5:7 lines from each of the four highest yielding F 2:5 families from each population and each environment (a total of 72 lines), and nine parents involved in the three populations were evaluated in replicated trials in both DS and NS environments in 1998B and 1999B. Mean yieldof lines selected in the NS environment was significantly higher than the mean of parents in populations SX 12008 and SX 12010 when tested in the NS environment. In population SX 12009, lines selected in the DS environment had higher mean yield than their parents when tested in NS environment. The mean yields of lines selected in the DS and NS environments did not differ significantly when tested in the DS environment in any population. NS environment seed yields were positively correlated with DS yields, geometric mean yield (GM), percent reduction (PR) due to drought stress, and drought susceptibility index (DSI). In contrast, DS and GM yields were negatively correlated with PR and DSI, whereas the association between the latter two was positive. The 100 -seed weight was slightly reduced and mean maturity was accelerated by 2 to 4 d in DS versus NS environments. Considering the extra costs involved to test early generation selections for seed yield in DS environments, it does not appear to be advisable in common bean. Key words: Drought resistance in common bean, early generation yield test, F 2 -derived family selection, Phaseolus vulgaris, seed yield

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207