MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cloth-based hybridization array system for the detection of multiple antibiotic resistance genes in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Typhimurium DT104

2004· article· en· W2088077968 on OpenAlexaff
Martine Gauthier, B.W. Blais

Bibliographic record

VenueLetters in Applied Microbiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalmonella entericaAmpliconBiologySalmonellaSerotypeMultiplex polymerase chain reactionPolymerase chain reactionMicrobiologyMultiplexHybridization probeDigoxigeninGeneGeneticsBacteriaIn situ hybridizationGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: A simple DNA macroarray system was developed for detection of antibiotic resistance and other marker genes associated with the multidrug-resistant food pathogen Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Typhimurium DT104. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) incorporating digoxigenin-dUTP was used to simultaneously amplify seven marker sequences, with subsequent rapid detection of the amplicons by hybridization with an array of probes immobilized on polyester cloth and immunoenzymatic assay of the bound label. This system provided sensitive detection of the different genetic markers in the S. Typhimurium DT104 genome, giving positive reactions with as few as 10 CFU, and the hybridizations were highly specific, with no reactions of amplicons with heterologous probes on the array. CONCLUSIONS: This cloth-based hybridization array system (CHAS) provides a simple, cost-effective tool for monitoring S. Typhimurium DT104 in foods and their production environment. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The CHAS is a simple and cost-effective tool for the simultaneous detection of amplicons generated in a multiplex PCR, and the concept is broadly applicable to the detection and characterization of food pathogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLetters in Applied MicrobiologySame topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207