A Rheological Evaluation of the Interactions in Water between a Cationic Cellulose Ether and Sodium Poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonates)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rheology of solutions of a cationic cellulose ether (JR400) and either sodium poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonate) (PAMPS) or a copolymer of sodium 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonate and N - n -dodecylmethacrylamide (PAMPS-Dod) has been examined over a wide composition range in the semidilute regime (10 g L -1 ) by steady shear and time-dependent steady shear measurements. Miscible combinations of pairs of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes form in two composition domains: (1) a polyanion-poor region which exhibits shear thinning characteristics and (2) a polyanion-rich region which presents Newtonian behavior at low shear rates and, as the shear rate is increased, passes through a shear-thickening region before exhibiting a sharp decrease in viscosity. The latter fluids exhibit significant thixotropy, which is shown to depend on the delay time between measurements and on the composition of the fluids. Models based on electrostatically driven interactions between two oppositely charged polyelectrolytes poorly matched in terms of size, rigidity, and charge density are proposed to account for the unusual rheological behavior of the polyelectrolyte complexes under study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".