Rhodium complexes stabilized by phosphine-functionalized phosphonium ionic liquids used as higher alkene hydroformylation catalysts: influence of the phosphonium headgroup on catalytic activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monodentate phosphine-functionalized phosphonium ionic liquids (PFILs) were employed as ligands for Rh complexes and used in the hydroformylation of higher alkenes. Three PFILs were designed by varying the length of the P-alkyl chain attached to the phosphonium moiety, for alkyl = methyl (1), butyl (2), octyl (3), in order to tune their solubility properties. In all PFILs, the phosphonium unit is linked to a diphenylphosphino functionality by an undecyl linker, with bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide as counter anion. These PFILs were combined with a Rh(I) precursor, [Rh(acac)(CO)(2)], to provide a biphasic hydroformylation catalyst for the transformation of 1-octene, 1-decene and 1-dodecene using tetradecyltributylphosphonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, [P(4,4,4,14)]NTf(2) as a solvent. Good activities and excellent selectivities were obtained for these PFILs-Rh(I) complexes. Variation of the P-alkyl length in the PFIL ligand influenced the stability, catalytic activity and selectivity of the PFIL-stabilized catalyst.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".