MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Cardiac Contractility and Performance can be Reliably Measured Day-to-Day Using Digital Ballistocardiography

2010· article· en· W2088276902 on OpenAlexaff
John Neary, David S. MacQuarrie, E. Busse

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSupine positionContractilityCardiologyInternal medicineCardiac cycleDiastoleBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: We measured the mechanical function of the heart to determine whether cardiac contractility can be reliably measured using digital ballistocardiography (dBG), as this would have important implications for non-invasive cardiac assessment following exercise training or tapering. METHODS: A group of healthy subjects (N=8; 3 females; mean ± SD, age= 31.7±10.5yrs) with no known cardiovascular disease were assessed on three consecutive days (D1, D2, D3), at the same time of the day and under similar conditions in a quite laboratory setting. Each subject had the dBG-300 sensor attached to the skin using solid gel electrodes (single lead EKG) while lying supine under resting conditions. The factory calibrated dBG-300 sensor, which records the hearts vibration (milli-gravity, mG) was placed over the sternum approximately 1cm above the xiphoid process. Thereafter, a 30-second ballistocardiogram was recorded and stored for later analysis. A total of 15 dBG waveforms (heart beats) were analysed for each subject per day and then averaged (mean±SD). RESULTS: Results showed that group means were not statistically (p≤0.05) different for any of the following contractile variables, including: atrial systole or A-wave (D1= 9.3±3.5 mG; D2= 8.6±4.9 mG; D3= 9.0±5.4 mG), mitral valve open (D1= 26.3±6.5 mG; D2= 26.2±7.5 mG; D3= 23.7±6.2 mG), aortic valve open (D1= 23.9±8.6 mG; D2= 20.8±10.7 mG; D3= 16.5±8.9 mG), early diastolic filling (E-wave) (D1= 13.4±5.8 mG; D2= 13.3±7.1 mG; D3= 12.4±5.2 mG), and E/A ratio (D1= 1.8±0.9; D2= 2.5±1.9; D3= 2.1±1.8). However, significant differences were found within subject data for some individuals, but these differences were likely related to changes in daily heart rate (p≤0.05). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that: 1) day-to-day cardiac contractility can be measured reliably using non-invasive dBG; 2) individual differences day-to-day should be corrected to an arbitrary heart rate, and 3) both systolic and diastolic cardiac events can be reliably monitored before and after an exercise training program with dBG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→