MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088279907 · doi:10.1002/joc.1625

Coherent structures in urban roughness sublayer turbulence

2007· article· en· W2088279907 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Climatology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensible heatCanyonTurbulenceMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceMomentum (technical analysis)Atmospheric sciencesUrban climatologyRoofGeologyGeographyGeomorphologyUrban climateUrban planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Data measured within and above an urban street canyon is used to analyse the importance of coherent structures in turbulent transfer. The atmosphere was probed simultaneously at six different heights from the base of the street canyon up to 2.2 times the mean building height. Integral length scales, joint probability densities, quadrant measures and wavelet‐based conditional sampling techniques are used to picture momentum and sensible heat exchange in the urban roughness sublayer. Layers directly at roof height show smallest length scales. With increasing distance from roofs, length scales increase, both up to higher levels above the roofs and also down to the base of the street canyon. Quadrant analysis indicates that turbulent momentum and sensible heat fluxes are strongly sweep‐dominated in large parts of the street canyon and close to the roofs. Only at the highest measurement levels do ejections slightly dominate exchange. Exchange is intermittent where length scales are largest, namely in the lower street canyon and at higher levels in the urban roughness sublayer. At rooftop, exchange is more efficient and least intermittent. A wavelet‐based detection is used to reconstruct time‐height cross‐sections of paired events measured at multiple levels simultaneously. Two types of sharp scalar fronts were identified—sweeps followed by ejections and ejections followed by sweeps. Both are important in transporting momentum and sensible heat. Copyright © 2007 Royal Meteorological Society

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it