Does oxygen limit nitrogenase activity in soybean exposed to elevated CO<sub>2</sub>?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) plants grown under control (360 µmol mol−1) or elevated CO2 concentration (800 µmol mol−1) from 33 to 42 d after sowing were assayed for various components of in vivo nitrogenase activity to test the hypothesis that increasing carbohydrate supply to nodules would increase the potential (i.e. O2 saturated) nitrogenase activity and impose a more severe O2 limitation on both nodule metabolism and total nitrogenase activity. Within 51 h of elevated CO2 treatment, significant increases relative to control plants were seen in total nitrogenase activity expressed per plant. After 6 d of elevated CO2, the total nitrogenase activity per plant was 18% higher than that in control. This was attributed to an initial increase in nodule size, and a subsequent increase in nodule number following plant exposure to elevated CO2. However, after 9 d of elevated CO2, the potential and total nitrogenase activities per gram nodule dry weight were lower, not higher than corresponding values in plants in the control treatment. These results did not support the hypothesis. It was concluded that the metabolic capacity of the control nodules were not limited by carbohydrate supply, at least at the assay temperatures employed here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".