Does oxygen limit nitrogenase activity in soybean exposed to elevated CO<sub>2</sub>?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr) plants grown under control (360 µ mol mol −1 ) or elevated CO 2 concentration (800 µ mol mol −1 ) from 33 to 42 d after sowing were assayed for various components of in vivo nitrogenase activity to test the hypothesis that increasing carbohydrate supply to nodules would increase the potential (i.e. O 2 saturated) nitrogenase activity and impose a more severe O 2 limitation on both nodule metabolism and total nitrogenase activity. Within 51 h of elevated CO 2 treatment, significant increases relative to control plants were seen in total nitrogenase activity expressed per plant. After 6 d of elevated CO 2 , the total nitrogenase activity per plant was 18% higher than that in control. This was attributed to an initial increase in nodule size, and a subsequent increase in nodule number following plant exposure to elevated CO 2 . However, after 9 d of elevated CO 2 , the potential and total nitrogenase activities per gram nodule dry weight were lower, not higher than corresponding values in plants in the control treatment. These results did not support the hypothesis. It was concluded that the metabolic capacity of the control nodules were not limited by carbohydrate supply, at least at the assay temperatures employed here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".