MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088365114 · doi:10.1117/12.898905

Improving the accuracy of the bimetallic grayscale photomasks using a feedback controlled flat-top beam

2011· article· en· W2088365114 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Qarehbaghi, Glenn H. Chapman, Waris Boonyasiriwat

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Photolithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrayscalePhotomaskMaterials scienceOpticsLaserOptoelectronicsRaster scanIndium tin oxideComputer scienceThin filmResistPixelNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bimetallic grayscale photomasks contain two thin layers of metals (Bismuth/Indium or Tin/Indium), 15-300nm thick on transparent substrates. Laser exposure converts the films by thermal reaction into transparent alloy oxides. The Optical Density changes from ~3.0OD (unexposed) to <0.22OD (fully exposed), creating grayscale photomasks. With using a open loop direct-write raster-scan writing system with a CW Argon-ion laser, grayscale masks with 6-bit accuracy was achieved. To reduce mask nonuniformity, sensors added to the beam path before and after the mask turning the system to create a real-time OD and beam measurement feedback system. This feedback compensates for changes in film parameters: film thickness reducing the mask error to ±0.3 gray-levels, yielding to a potential 256 gray-level mask. This leaves nonuniformities due to the Gaussian shape still limits the accuracy. To remove these, a refractive field-mapping shaper was used to create a nearly flat-top power laser spot power distribution. The OD system also allows us to profile the grayscale levels in more detail after writing. A full 8-bit picture was written on a test mask with the feedback system showed significant improvement in the number of gray-levels. Some fluctuations were observed at the final pattern due to spaces between lines and nonuniformity of table speed. Some 3D test structures are created on the photoresist with the masks written with the feedback system to demonstrate the accuracy and grayscale abilities of the bimetallic thin-films

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvancements in Photolithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207