MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088389646 · doi:10.1002/pssc.200461607

Thermally stimulated current spectroscopy and photoluminescence of carbon‐doped semi‐insulating GaN grown by ammonia‐based molecular beam epitaxy

2005· article· en· W2088389646 on OpenAlexaff
D. C. Look, B. Claflin, S. Haffouz, H. Tang, J. B. Webb

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific Research
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceMolecular beam epitaxyDopingMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)SpectroscopyCarbon fibersElectrical resistivity and conductivityAmmoniaOptoelectronicsEpitaxyChemistryNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)PhysicsOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Semi-insulating GaN samples, grown by ammonia-based molecular beam epitaxy and doped with carbon, were investigated by thermally stimulated current spectroscopy and photoluminescence at 4.2 K. In addition to a dominant trap at 0.90 eV, thought to be related to the N interstitial, a trap at 0.50 eV, presumably related to CGa, was observed in the samples with high carbon concentrations. For all of the carbon-doped samples, strong photoluminescence (PL) bands were observed in the yellow (YL), blue (BL), and near-band-edge regions, with the YL dominating, and the BL decreasing as the carbon concentration increased. Besides the PL and trap properties, the carbon doping also influenced the resistivity and effective carrier lifetime. (© 2005 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physicsSame topicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsFrench-language works237,207