Nucleophilically Assisted and Cationic Ring-Opening Polymerization of Tin-Bridged [1]Ferrocenophanes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To obtain mechanistic insight, detailed studies of the intriguing "spontaneous" ambient temperature ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of tin-bridged [1]ferrocenophanes Fe(eta-C(5)H(4))(2)SnR(2) 3a (R = t-Bu) and 3b (R = Mes) in solution have been performed. The investigations explored the influence of non-nucleophilic additives such as radicals and radical traps, neutral and anionic nucleophiles, Lewis acids, protic species, and other cationic electrophiles. Significantly, two novel methodologies and mechanisms for the ROP of strained [1]ferrocenophanes are proposed based on this study. First, as the addition of amine nucleophiles such as pyridine was found to strongly accelerate the polymerization rate in solution, a new nucleophilicallyassisted ROP methodology was proposed. This operates at ambient temperature in solution even in the presence of chlorosilanes but, unlike the anionic polymerization of ferrocenophanes, does not involve cyclopentadienyl anions. Second, the addition of small quantities of the electrophilic species H(+) and Bu(3)Sn(+) was found to lead to a cationic ROP process. These studies suggest that the "spontaneous" ROP of tin-bridged [1]ferrocenophanes may be a consequence of the presence of spurious, trace quantities of Lewis basic or acidic impurities. The new ROP mechanisms reported are likely to be of general significance for the ROP of other metallocenophanes (e.g., for thermal ROP in the melt) and for other metallacycles containing group 14 elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".