Mild to Moderate Hyperthermia Does Not Worsen Outcome after Severe Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperthermia worsens outcome in clinical and experimental studies of ischemic stroke. Thus, we tested whether hyperthermia aggravates intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in rats. A striatal hemorrhage was produced via an infusion of bacterial collagenase. In a preliminary experiment, we compared brain and core temperatures (via telemetry) during heating (infrared lamp). The brain temperature rise exceeded that produced by enforced core hyperthermia, which was used subsequently. In these experiments up to three hyperthermia conditions (versus normothermia) were tested including: hyperthermia (>38.5 degrees C) over the first (HYP-1) or second 24 h period (HYP-2) after ICH and 3 h of 40 degrees C hyperthermia starting 12 h after ICH (HYP-3). The HYP-1, HYP-2, and HYP-3 treatments did not affect functional deficits (e.g., spontaneous forelimb use, skilled reaching) or the volume of injury at 30 days. Furthermore, the HYP-1 treatment did not aggravate injury or deficits at 7 days. Bleeding and inflammation, which contribute to pathology, were not significantly altered by HYP-1 and HYP-3 treatments. Bleeding was assessed at 1 day, and macrophages and neutrophils were counted at 2 and 4 days. Accordingly, hyperthermia, under the present conditions, did not worsen outcome after striatal ICH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".