MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088555532 · doi:10.7202/037370ar

Traduire le texte dans son projet. Le littéralisme est soluble dans la poésie moderne : Auden

2007· article· fr· W2088555532 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Annie Brisset

Bibliographic record

VenueTTR traduction terminologie rédaction · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traduire le texte dans son projet. Le littéralisme est soluble dans la poésie moderne : Auden — Bien qu'il soit reconnu comme l'un des plus grands poètes du XXe siècle, W. H. Auden est peu traduit en français. Son oeuvre, il est vrai, résiste à la traduction lorsqu'elle s'amuse, comme dans le poème qui sert ici d'exemple, à crypter le langage de tous les jours en le coulant dans une forme contrainte par la tradition. « The Three Companions » est un poème clé dans l'oeuvre d'Auden qui le publie au début des années trente et le reconduit dans plusieurs de ses recueils. Nous en proposons une analyse qui ouvre un dialogue avec chacune des traductions (une dizaine) et avec les commentaires qui les accompagnent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTTR traduction terminologie rédactionSame topicFrench Literature and PoetryFrench-language works237,207