RAPD typification: phenetic analysis of Vaccinium inflorescences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The inflorescence of Vaccinium hiepii is described for the first time, and as predicted, its floral features are similar to those of V. chunii. However, this floral axis has nothing in common with the type of its putative section, i.e. Vaccinium sect. Galeopetalum. Subsequent numerical analyses of inflorescence types in Vaccinium using 43 taxa and 11 floral features suggest three inflorescence types for the genus: (1) the ‘myrtillus’ type where a single flower emerges directly from the axil of some leaves or bracts of the current shoot; (2) the ‘dialypetalum’ type where just the floral primordia are laid down within the confines of the perennating bud; (3) the ‘hiepii’ type where the complete floral axis is laid down within the perennating bud. Based on this tripartite division, a new taxon, Vaccinium sect. Calcicolus Vander Kloet sect. nov. is described for these Himalayan blueberries. A diagnostic key and brief description is provided for the eight species included in this new section.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".