MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088627495 · doi:10.5539/enrr.v4n3p103

Measurements of canopy interception and transpiration of openly-grown eastern redcedar in central Okalhoma

2014· article· en· W2088627495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment and Natural Resources Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranspirationInterceptionCanopyRangelandPrecipitationForestryEnvironmental scienceCanopy interceptionGeographyEcologyBotanyAgroforestryBiologyMeteorologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) is rapidly encroaching and degrading native prairie and rangeland landscapes in the Great Plains of the U.S. Little is known concerning the impacts of increasing redcedar density and areal coverage on local and regional water budgets through transpiration (Tr) and canopy interception (CI) of precipitation. Limited Tr and CI studies have been conducted in dense stands of redcedar but results from these studies may not be applicable to redcedar growing in open environments. Four redcedar trees (two large, two small) were located in central Oklahoma to measure Tr. Two limbs (one on the north face and one on the south face) on each of the large trees were instrumented with sapflux sensors to measure Tr from August 2010 through mid-July 2012. Limb level Tr was scaled to tree level Tr using ratios of both leaf and bole areas. Whole tree Tr was measured on two small redcedar trees from mid-May 2011 through mid-July 2012. Transpiration of the small redcedars was found to respond quickly to precipitation events, while the large redcedars did not. Redcedar Tr was compared to that of native grasses. The large redcedars exhibited higher Tr rates than native grasses while the small redcedars transpired at rates closely matching native grasses. Four different redcedars were instrumented to measure CI from October 2009 through mid-July of 2012. Redcedar canopies were found to intercept 100% of precipitation for events ? 2.4 mm. Redcedar canopies reduce annual precipitation received at the surface by about 33%, and as much as 39% in the western portion of the state. Significant canopy interception of precipitation, coupled with Tr rates as large as or larger than native grasses and with year-round Tr, suggests increases in redcedar density and areal coverage could affect local water resources (e.g. reducing infiltration, runoff, and ground water recharge rates).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it