MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088637810 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-4329

Abstract 4329: In vivo visualization of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in real time using a rapidly tuneable E-cadherin

2010· article· en· W2088637810 on OpenAlexaff
Hon S. Leong, Michael M. Lizardo, Shruti Nambiar, Amber Ablack, Daero Kim, Ann F. Chambers, John D. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadherinAdherens junctionEpithelial–mesenchymal transitionIn vivoMesenchymal stem cellCancer researchCancerCellCancer cellPathologyCell biologyChemistryBiologyMetastasisMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The transformation of benign tumour cells to invasive, metastatic tumour cells involves the dynamic redeployment of factors involved in cell adhesion and motility collectively known as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). While the loss of E-cadherin localization at cell-cell junctions is a hallmark feature of EMT, the impact of E-cadherin re-expression and modulation in metastatic cancer cells at distinct steps of the metastatic cascade has not been explored. To address this, we developed an intravital imaging approach that allows us to visualize changes in behaviour of highly metastatic MDA-MB-231-LN breast cancer cells in real time using a dynamically tuneable form of E-cadherin. Here, we show that upon induction of E-cadherin in vivo, cell-cell adherens junctions begin to appear within 30 minutes, concurrent with the accumulation of plasma membrane-localized E-cadherin and the retraction of tumour cell protrusions and the induction of a rounded epithelial-like morphology. Furthermore, subsequent depletion of E-cadherin results in a rapid reversion to the mesenchymal morphology. These studies demonstrate that E-cadherin is sufficient to induce a rapid mesenchymal to epithelial transition in vivo, and that sustained E-cadherin expression is required to maintain this less invasive morphology. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4329.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207