Evaluation of safety and efficacy of a 20% Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (Hizentra™), after a dose equivalent switch from intravenous or subcutaneous replacement therapy in a cohort of primary immunodeficient patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To assess the safety and efficacy of Hizentra™, a 20% human IgG for subcutaneous administration, in a cohort of patients with primary immunodeficiency disorders (PID) after a dose equivalent switch from their previous treatment. A cohort study of 57 PID patients was reviewed 3 months post-transition to the 20% Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (Hizentra™), in order to evaluate clinical outcomes and adverse events related to a dose-equivalent switch from 10% liquid solution intravenous (Privigen® and Gamunex®) or 16% subcutaneous replacement therapy (Vivaglobin®) to weekly infusion of Hizentra™, Descriptive analyses were performed in relations to IgG levels, total infusion volume and infusion time. Mean age of patients was 51.8 years old. The study showed IgG levels achieved with Hizentra™, were similar to pre-study levels with subcutaneous and higher by 17.1% compared to intravenous IgG. Local reactions were minimal and only one Hizentra™-related adverse event was reported. Generally, lower infusion volume with Hizentra™, also led to a reduction in total infusion time and in the number of infusion sites compared to other subcutaneous replacement therapy. Switching to Hizentra™, maintained serum IgG levels without dose increases, overall reduction in infusion time and infusion sites. It therefore confirms that for our cohort, this new strategy is practical while being similar in effectiveness and safety to both intravenous and subcutaneous replacement therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".