MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088714383 · doi:10.1139/y08-099

Sirt1 hyperexpression in SHR heart related to left ventricular hypertrophy

2009· article· en· W2088714383 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ling Li, Lei Zhao, Wuliya Yiming, Yongsheng Yu, Junli Duan, Ding‐Feng Su

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyMuscle hypertrophyLeft ventricular hypertrophyHeart failureAortaSpontaneously hypertensive ratMedicineMessenger RNAGene expressionBiologyBlood pressureGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sirt1 is a human homologue of the silent information regulator factor 2 (Sir2) and has an NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase activity. This protein is reported to have a pathogenetic role in muscle differentiation, diabetic nephropathy, and heart failure. In this study, we investigated the expression of sirt1 in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) to obtain insight into the function of sirt1 in hypertensive cardiovascular hypertrophy. The gene and protein expression of sirt1 was increased in the heart in SHR compared with normotensive WKY rats. Sirt1 mRNA was not different in the aorta between SHR and WKY rats. Sirt1 mRNA expression in heart and aorta was not related to hemodynamic parameters in SHR. Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy was significantly and positively related to the expression of heart tissue sirt1 mRNA in SHR. Aortic hypertrophy, however, was not related to sirt1 mRNA in the aorta. The increased sirt1 protein expression was accompanied by severe cardiac hypertrophy in older SHR. These results suggest that the increase of sirt1 gene and protein expression in the heart was associated with cardiac hypertrophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicSirtuins and Resveratrol in MedicineFrench-language works237,207