MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088727683 · doi:10.1139/v03-049

An ab initio molecular orbital study of the geometry of the dicationic Wallach rearrangement intermediate

2003· article· en· W2088727683 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Robin A. Cox, David Y.K. Fung, Imre G. Csizmadia, Erwin Buncel

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
KeywordsChemistryBent molecular geometryAb initioMolecular orbitalSteric effectsLone pairComputational chemistryAromaticityAb initio quantum chemistry methodsCrystallographyRing (chemistry)Methyl groupStereochemistryMoleculeGroup (periodic table)Organic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ab initio calculations have been performed on several different structures for the dicationic intermediate proposed for the Wallach rearrangement of aromatic azoxy compounds to hydroxy-substituted azo systems in strongly acidic media. For the unsubstituted parent compound azoxybenzene, these calculations reveal that the preferred structure for the intermediate is planar, as previously assumed, but bent rather than linear as we have formulated it. The presence of two methyl groups at the para positions of both aromatic rings does not change this situation, but six methyl groups at all para and ortho ring positions lead to a different preferred structure — still bent but with the two aromatic rings now at 90° to one another rather than being coplanar — undoubtedly due to steric interference between the ortho methyl groups. In all the cases examined the two positive charges reside primarily in the aromatic rings rather than on the nitrogens, which are sp2 hybridized and still have their lone pairs. The overall structures can best be regarded as two six-electron π systems joined together, with little communication between the two rings. For the most part the calculations are in good agreement with experimental observations. Recent calculations on other possible reaction intermediates by other groups are also discussed.Key words: Ab initio calculations, Wallach rearrangement, azoxyarenes, reaction intermediate, acid catalysis, intermediate structure, reaction mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207