MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088765952 · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.017

Integration of a Consultancy Hydrotechnical Scale Model into Teaching Hydraulics

2013· article· en· W2088765952 on OpenAlexaff
Zahiraniza Mustaffa, Ayesha Ghulam Rasool, Saied Saiedi

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDam Engineering and Safety
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
FundersUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia
KeywordsHydraulicsSyllabusEngineeringCivil engineeringProcess (computing)Scale (ratio)Engineering managementComputer scienceMathematics educationPhysicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on the integration of a consultancy physical model of a hydrotechnical structure into teaching material at a Malaysian engineering university. A significant part of the syllabus for hydraulics in the Civil Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia is dedicated to the hydraulic design of energy dissipation structures and spillways. The designed lessons are supported by a series of lectures and a case study involving homework, laboratory demonstration and field visit. Furthermore, the legacy of a real-world consultancy project on scale modelling of a large flow regulating pond is integrated into the course. A significant part of the modelling investigation was the laboratory reproduction of an adverse erosion process below a large stilling basin and its concrete apron. Following the completion of the consultancy project, the facilities have been used for hands-on lessons on hydraulics. Students’ responses towards this innovative teaching approach are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia - Social and Behavioral SciencesSame topicDam Engineering and SafetyFrench-language works237,207