Targeted Cyclooxygenase Gene (Ptgs) Exchange Reveals Discriminant Isoform Functionality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prostaglandin G/H synthase enzymes, commonly termed COX-1 and COX-2, differ markedly in their responses to regulatory stimuli and their tissue expression patterns. COX-1 is the dominant source of "housekeeping" prostaglandins, whereas COX-2 synthesizes prostaglandins of relevance to pain, inflammation, and mitogenesis. Despite these distinctions, the two enzymes are remarkably conserved, and their subcellular distributions overlap considerably. To address the functional interchangeability of the two isozymes, mice in which COX-1 is expressed under COX-2 regulatory elements were created by a gene targeting "knock-in" strategy. In macrophages from these mice, COX-1 was shown to be lipopolysaccharide-inducible in a manner analogous to COX-2 in wild-type macrophages. However, COX-1 failed to substitute effectively for COX-2 in lipopolysaccharide-induced prostaglandin E2 synthesis at low concentrations of substrate and in the metabolism of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol. The marked depression of the major urinary metabolite of prostacyclin in COX-2 null mice was only partially rescued by COX-1 knock-in, whereas the main urinary metabolite of prostaglandin E2 was rescued totally. Replacement with COX-1 partially rescued the impact of COX-2 deletion on reproductive function. The renal pathology consequent to COX-2 deletion was delayed but not prevented, whereas the corresponding peritonitis was unaltered. Insertion of COX-1 under the regulatory sequences that drive COX-2 expression indicated that COX-1 can substitute for some COX-2 actions and rescue only some of the consequences of gene disruption. Manipulation of COX-2 also revealed a preference for coupling with distinct downstream prostaglandin synthases in vivo. These mice will provide a valuable reagent with which to elucidate the distinct roles of the COX enzymes in mammalian biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".