MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088827101 · doi:10.1021/bi026122g

Radical Formation at Tyr39 and Tyr153 Following Reaction of Yeast Cytochrome <i>c</i> Peroxidase with Hydrogen Peroxide

2002· article· en· W2088827101 on OpenAlexaff
Haoming Zhang, Shouming He, A. Grant Mauk

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEnzyme-mediated dye degradation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRadicalCytochrome c peroxidaseHydrogen peroxidePeroxidaseResidue (chemistry)CatalysisPhotochemistryCytochrome cPeroxideYeastMass spectrometrySpin trappingStereochemistryEnzymeBiochemistryOrganic chemistryMitochondrion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of yeast cytochrome c peroxidase (CcP) compound I has been recognized for many years to be associated with formation of two protein-centered radicals. One of these radical sites is located at Trp191 and is directly involved in catalytic oxidation of ferrocytochrome c (Sivaraja, M., Goodin, D. B., Smith, M., Hoffman, B. M. (1989) Science 245, 738-740). The second radical has been proposed to arise from one or more tyrosyl residues of CcP. However, the tyrosyl residue (or residues) capable of forming this radical has not been identified, and the functional role of this radical remains poorly understood. In the present work, this issue has been addressed through the combined use of the spin-trapping reagent 2-methyl-2-nitrosopropane and peptide mapping by electrospray mass spectrometry to identify Tyr39 and Tyr153 as two tyrosyl residues that are capable of forming radical centers upon reaction of CcP with hydrogen peroxide. The implications of this observation to the catalytic mechanism of CcP are addressed with reference to the three-dimensional structure of CcP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicEnzyme-mediated dye degradationFrench-language works237,207