MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2088859315 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021304

An $\ion{H}{i}$ interstellar bubble linked to the O-type stars BD +24°3866 and BD +25°3952

2002· article· en· W2088859315 on OpenAlexafffund
C. E. Cappa, S. Pineault, E. M. Arnal, S. Cichowolski

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsStarsAstronomyInterstellar mediumMolecular cloudGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the ISM in the vicinity of the O-type stars BD +24°3866 (O8.5II(f)), BD +24°3881 (O6.5III(f)) and BD +24° 3952 (O8) based on radio continuum and Hi line data obtained with the Synthesis Telescope of the Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory (DRAO) with synthesized beams of 1 5 and 7´ at 1420 and 408 MHz, respectively. High angular resolution IRAS data (HIRES) are also analyzed. BD +24°3866 is found to be located close to the inner border of a slowly expanding shell. The evolved Hii region Sh2-88, which is excited by BD +25°3952, appears to be interacting with neutral material in the approaching part of this shell. The whole structure is at a distance of 2.4 kpc and is about 2315 pc in radius. The total swept up mass is 1300 . The stellar winds of BD +24°3866 and BD +25°3952, are mainly responsible for shaping the Hi structure. An Hi expanding shell was also found to be related to the Hii region G61.7+0.9. At a kinematic distance of 2.4 kpc, this feature is 10 pc in radius and has neutral and ionized masses of 200 and 135 , respectively. The present observational data do not allow us to identify a definite interstellar Hi feature associated with BD +24°3881. We consider different explanations for this fact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→