MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088860979 · doi:10.1109/ais.2010.5547016

Indoor robot navigation through intelligent processing of RFID signal measurements

2010· article· en· W2088860979 on OpenAlexaff
Suruz Miah, Wail Gueaieb

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRSSMobile robotMobile robot navigationRobotComputer scienceReal-time computingRadio navigationNavigation systemEmbedded systemArtificial intelligenceRobot controlGlobal Positioning SystemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this manuscript is to present a novel non-vision-based indoor mobile robot navigation technique with an intelligent processing of received signal strength (RSS) measurements using a customized Radio Frequency IDentification system. The navigation problem of a mobile robot has been traditionally solved by several approaches suggested in the literature. Among the most common shortcomings of those approaches are the use of excessive number of sensors or multiple reference RF stations for the robot to estimate its location in an indoor environment. Moreover, a spatial layout or cost problems limit the applicability of those approaches in many real-world robotic systems. The current work is devoted to developing a mobile robot navigation system where RSS measurements are provided to the robot by a customized RFID reader mounted on it. For it to navigate, the robot simply applies necessary actions to its actuators based on the intelligent processing of those RSS measurements. The customized RFID reader architecture is simulated using the comprehensive electromagnetic commercial software, FEKO. The proposed navigation system is evaluated through a number of computer simulations. It is shown through these simulations that a mobile robot has the ability to successfully navigate along a pre-defined path in an indoor environment regardless of the path's complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207