NOS inhibition restores renal responses to atrial distension during pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) biosynthesis increases during pregnancy and has been shown to suppress baroreceptor activity. The renal response to a simulated increase in circulating blood volume (atrial distension) is also attenuated at this time. We hypothesized that blocking NO biosynthesis during pregnancy would restore the renal response. Female rats were implanted with indwelling intracardiac balloons and central venous cannulas. After recovery, they were mated, and on day 14 of pregnancy, osmotic minipumps containing the NO synthase inhibitor N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) or its inactive enantiomer N(G)-nitro-D-arginine methyl ester (D-NAME) (120 mg/2 ml at 10 microg/min) were implanted. In response to atrial distension (1 h), urine output increased in the D- and L-NAME-treated virgin rats. During pregnancy (day 20), this response was attenuated in the D-NAME-treated, but not the L-NAME-treated, animals, i.e., after a simulated increase in circulating blood volume, inhibition of NO biosynthesis restored the renal response of pregnant rats to that seen in virgin animals. We conclude that, during normal pregnancy, increased NO biosynthesis blunts the reflex renal response to atrial distension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".