Systematic trends in electronic properties of alkali hydridesThis article is part of a Special Issue on Spectroscopy at the University of New Brunswick in honour of Colan Linton and Ron Lees.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obtaining ultracold samples of dipolar molecules is a current challenge, which requires an accurate knowledge of their electronic properties to guide the ongoing experiments. Alkali hydride molecules have permanent dipole moments significantly larger than those of mixed alkali species, and, as pointed out by Taylor-Juarros et al. (Eur. Phys. J. D, 31, 213 (2004)) and by Juarros et al. (Phys. Rev. A, 73, 041403 (2006)), are thus good candidates for cold molecule formation. In this paper, using a standard quantum chemistry approach based on pseudopotentials for atomic core representation, large Gaussian basis sets, and effective core polarization potential, we systematically investigate the electronic properties of the alkali hydrides LiH to CsH, to discuss general trends of their behavior. We computed (for the first time for NaH, KH, RbH, and CsH) the variation of their static polarizability with the internuclear distance. Moreover, in addition to potential curves, we determine accurate values of permanent and transition dipole moments for ground and excited states depending on the internuclear distance. The electronic properties of all alkali hydrides are compared with one another, in the light of the numerous other data available in the literature. Finally, the influence of the quality of the representation of the hydrogen electronic affinity in the approach on the results is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".