Genome-Wide Linkage Analysis of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP), an important risk factor for coronary heart disease, is a complex trait with multiple genetic etiologies. While some loci affecting BP variation are known (eg, angiotensinogen), there are likely to be novel signals that can be detected with a genome scan approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: A genome-wide scan was performed in 125 random and 81 obese families participating in the Québec Family Study. A multipoint variance-components linkage analysis of 420 markers (353 microsatellites and 67 restriction fragment length polymorphisms) revealed several signals (P:<0.0023) for systolic BP on 1p (D1S551, ATP1A1), 2p (D2S1790, D2S2972), 5p (D5S1986), 7q (D7S530), 8q (CRH), and 19p (D19S247). Suggestive evidence (0.0023<P:<0.01) was found on 3q, 10p, 12p, 14q, and 22q. The results were encouraging for HSD3B1 (P:<0.03), AGT (P:<0.03), ACE (P:<0.02), and adipsin (P:<0.005) but null with regard to other candidates (eg, renin, and glucocorticoid and adrenergic receptors). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple linkage regions support the notion that risk for hypertension is due to multiple (ie, oligogenic) susceptibility loci. Comparisons across the complete, random, and obese samples suggest that some regions are specific to BP and others may involve obesity (eg, pleiotropy, epistasis, or gene-environment interaction). Some of these areas harbor known candidates. Others involve novel regions, some of which replicate previous reports and provide a focus for future studies to identify novel genes that influence interindividual variation in BP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".