MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088898191 · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.626804

Approximation of planar offset curves with globally bounded error for B-spline NC tool paths

2012· article· en· W2088898191 on OpenAlexaff
Maqsood Ahmed Khan, Z.C. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Production Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffset (computer science)Spline (mechanical)Bounded functionUpper and lower boundsBounding overwatchB-splineApproximation errorAlgorithmMathematicsMachiningCurve fittingMathematical optimizationComputer scienceMathematical analysisEngineeringStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The topic of representing the offset of a 2D B-spline curve in the same form has been a topic of research for a long time, and it has many industrial applications, especially in NC tool path generation for pocketing. For B-spline tool paths, it is often required that the tool paths have fewer control points, lower base function degree, and the approximation error is guaranteed within a given tolerance over the entire curve. However, the existing methods utilising global error control approximate the offsets of 2D free-form curves with high function degree and many control points. Although these offsets are useful in computer-aided design, they are inappropriate for the use of CNC machining. To address the problems in order to generate high quality B-spline tool paths, this original work formulates an error function of the offset approximation and then constructs a NURBS curve to globally bound the errors. By checking the maximum coefficient of the bounding curve, the upper bound of all the approximated offset errors is found and the errors can be reduced by segmenting the curve at appropriate knot values. The proposed new approach is more efficient, and the resulting offset approximations are more accurate, with fewer control points and lower function degree. It is useful to generate B-spline tool paths for CNC pocketing, which have the potential for other applications in industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Production ResearchSame topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207