Hemodynamic changes before acute heart failure episodes in patients with advanced systolic left ventricular dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: We sought to verify which changes in right ventricular pressures occur before acute heart failure (HF) in patients with advanced systolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. In patients with chronic HF, continuous hemodynamic monitoring by implantable devices may detect increases in pulmonary pressures before the onset of symptoms. METHODS: A device which allowed monitoring of right ventricular systolic (RVSP) and diastolic pressure (RVDP) and an estimate of pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (ePAD) was implanted in 10 patients with advanced LV systolic dysfunction and frequent cardiovascular hospitalizations [mean age 56.8 years; New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes IIIb-IV; LV ejection fraction at echocardiography 21 +/- 2%]. RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 15 +/- 12 months, 18 hospitalizations due to acute HF were recorded; 10 episodes were characterized by symptoms due to low-cardiac output (LCO) and eight episodes were characterized by symptoms due to pulmonary congestion. RVSP and ePAD increased before six hospitalizations and decreased before three episodes; RVDP increased before 10 hospitalizations and decreased before one. The extent of RVDP increase was 16 +/- 24% before pulmonary congestion episodes and 29 +/- 32% before LCO episodes. CONCLUSION: An increase in RVDP was the most frequent hemodynamic change detected by the implantable hemodynamic monitor before hospitalizations due to acute HF in patients having advanced systolic LV dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".