Particle momentum effects from the detonation of heterogeneous explosives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detonation of a spherical high explosive charge containing solid particles generates a high-speed two-phase flow comprised of a decaying spherical air blast wave together with a rapidly expanding cloud of particles. The particle momentum effects associated with this two-phase flow have been investigated experimentally and numerically for a heterogeneous explosive consisting of a packed bed of inert particles saturated with a liquid explosive. Experimentally, the dispersion of the particles was tracked using flash radiography and high-speed photography. A particle streak gauge was developed to measure the rate of arrival of the particles at various locations. Using a cantilever gauge and a free-piston impulse gauge, it was found that the particle momentum flux provided the primary contribution of the multiphase flow to the near-field impulse applied to a nearby small structure. The qualitative features of the interaction between a particle and the flow field are illustrated using simple models for the particle motion and blast wave dynamics. A more realistic Eulerian two-fluid model for the gas-particle flow and a finite-element model for the structural response of the cantilever gauge are then used to determine the relative contributions of the gas and particles to the loading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it