The Association of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias with Isolated Atrial Amyloid Disease: Preliminary Observations in Autopsied Heart Specimens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Isolated atrial amyloidosis (IAA) is associated with atrial tachyarrhythmias. However, only a few studies have appraised atrial tachyarrhythmias and atrial depolarization abnormalities in connection with high-grade IAA. We conducted a collaborative retrospective study to assess this association. METHODS: One hundred consecutive autopsied hearts were studied histologically for IAA. To increase the specificity for atrial depolarization abnormalities in this preliminary study, we excluded those specimens with intermediate amyloid involvement, i.e. IAA grades 1 and 2 (grade 0 = absent or trivial deposits; grade 1 = small deposits; grade 2 = moderate deposits; grade 3 = dense, large deposits). We then screened for baseline, premortem electrocardiograms (ECGs) to assess rhythm. In those with sinus rhythm, the P wave axis, duration, dispersion and terminal force in V1 were determined under magnification. RESULTS: Of the 27 premortem ECGs corresponding to the autopsy specimens with grades 3 (sample) or 0 (controls) IAA, 9 showed sinus rhythm, 13 showed atrial fibrillation, 1 showed atrial flutter and 4 were uninterpretable. Fourteen autopsied hearts (52%) were positive for grade 3 IAA. Ten of those had atrial tachyarrhythmias (9 atrial fibrillation and 1 atrial flutter) compared to 4 of the 13 hearts with grade 0 IAA (72 vs. 31%, respectively; p = 0.03). Although there was excellent interobserver agreement using intraclass correlation coefficients, there were no significant differences in P wave measurements among the small number of patients with sinus rhythm for grade 3 versus grade 0 IAA. CONCLUSION: In a collaborative, preliminary, pilot assessment of autopsied hearts for which premortem ECGs were necessarily screened retrospectively, significantly more hearts with high-grade IAA were associated with atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to those with low-grade IAA. A larger study with an appropriately matched autopsy control group is needed to confirm these and previous observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".