Nanovoid characterization of nominally pure aluminium using synchrotron small angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) study of nanovoids in 99.988 and 99.995 at.% aluminium is presented. Absolute intensity calibration using a glassy carbon standard is used to extract the weak SAXS signature from nanovoids introduced by thermal quenching. SAXS analysis methods, including Guinier, Porod and Indirect Transform, are used to obtain values for the void–size, number distribution and volume fraction, as well as measures of the void-metal matrix interface structure in quenched aluminium samples. The SAXS analysis has identified a residual impurity effect on void formation and has been used to characterize trends in nanovoid size, number distribution and interface structure as a function of ageing time at elevated temperatures (artificial ageing). The work presented here, including identification of experimental tools that can be readily improved, demonstrates that SAXS studies are capable of providing precise characterization of nanovoid structure in aluminium. This level of information will be useful in developing phenomenological models of void nucleation and growth capable of linking atomic scale phenomena to macroscopic material properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".