MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089132377 · doi:10.1055/s-0031-1276644

Progress in the Genetics of Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

2011· review· en· W2089132377 on OpenAlexaff
Gideon M. Hirschfield, Pietro Invernizzi

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Liver Disease · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary biliary cirrhosisDiseaseGenome-wide association studyHuman leukocyte antigenGenetic associationImmunologyBiologyGeneticsMedicineGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismAntigenInternal medicineGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease that has a prevalence of 1 in 1000 women over the age of 40. Treatment is presently limited to ursodeoxycholic acid, a hydrophilic bile acid that has nonspecific, choleretic, effects in cholestatic liver disease. PBC has strong autoimmune features, including highly specific loss of tolerance to a ubiquitous mitochondrial antigen. Both environmental and genetic factors are considered important in the pathogenesis of disease. Prior to the advent of genome-wide association studies, only class II human leucocyte antigen (HLA) loci (HLA-DRB1*08, *11, and *13) had been reproducibly shown to associate with disease. Non-HLA loci were suggested for several genes (e.g., CTLA-4, MDR3), but often inconclusively replicated. With the application of genome-wide technology, HLA was confirmed as the strongest association and many other risk loci have been identified, with equivalent effect size to HLA, including IL12A, IL12RB2, STAT4, IRF5-TNPO3, 17q12.21, MMEL1, SPIB, and CTLA-4. These collectively support an important role for innate and adaptive immunity in development of disease. Further insights are predicted as studies with larger cohorts are assembled, and different approaches are taken to further discover common and uncommon gene variants associated with disease. Disease subphenotypes such as response to therapy, clinical progression, and symptoms remain additional areas for further dedicated studies, and in which different genetic risk factors may be relevant. Identification of risk loci associated with disease has the potential to aid development of rational, disease-specific, therapies in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Liver DiseaseSame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207