MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089152650 · doi:10.1080/10286600801908915

Systems analysis models for disinfection by-product formation in chlorinated drinking water in Ontario

2008· article· en· W2089152650 on OpenAlexaffabout
Edward A. McBean, Zoe Zhu, Wen Zeng

Bibliographic record

VenueCivil Engineering and Environmental Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersMinistry of Environment
KeywordsHaloacetic acidsChlorineDissolved organic carbonWater treatmentSurface waterEnvironmental chemistryChemistryWater disinfectionTrihalomethaneTotal organic carbonEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results of examination of the formation and control of disinfection by-products (DBPs), specifically total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) and total haloacetic acids (HAAs) in water treatment, are described in this article. Systems analysis models for TTHMs and HAAs for drinking water treatment plants using 28 surface water sources in Ontario are developed. Statistically, significant predictive regression models for TTHMs from dissolved organic carbon (DOC), chlorination and temperature (r 2=0.72) and HAAs from DOC, chlorination and pH (r 2=0.72) are demonstrated. These models are used to consider options to decrease DBP formation by shifting from pre-chlorination to post-chlorination, demonstrating that the potential may exist by applying more of the chlorine at a later point in the treatment sequence. This type of shift may reduce TTHMs by up to 63% and HAAs by up to 39% for the conditions being experienced at Ontario surface water treatment plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.152
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivil Engineering and Environmental SystemsSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207