MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089174182 · doi:10.1353/mou.2009.0000

Survey And Excavation at Nysa on the Meander, 2009: The Gymnasium Portico and Palaestra

2009· article· fr· W2089174182 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Martin J. Beckmann

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeander (mathematics)ExcavationGeologyArchaeologyGeographyGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En juillet et août 2009, une équipe de l’University of Western Ontario a entrepris une campagne de prospection et de fouilles de cinq semaines dans le secteur du gymnase, à Nysa sur le Méandre. La prospection par géoradar a permis non seulement de situer l’emplacement du portique et de certaines pièces adjacentes, mais aussi de faire la découverte (inattendue) de trois grandes structures dans le secteur de la palestre. L’objectif principal des fouilles qui s’ensuivirent était de déterminer la nature de ces mystérieuses structures. L’une d’elles a été identifiée comme une très grande et profonde citerne antérieure à la construction du gymnase au II e siècle de notre ère. Les deux autres, contemporaines du gymnase, sont des conduites d’eau surélevées, longues chacune de 90 m et peut-être de fonction décorative, parallèles aux portiques de chaque côté de la palestre. En outre, deux bases inscrites en marbre ont été récupérées, dont une concerne probablement Titus Aelius Alkibiadès, citoyen de l’époque d’Antonin le Pieux, notable déjà bien attesté dans plusieurs inscriptions locales. Ces résultats contribuent de manière significative à notre connaissance du tracé et de la chronologie du gymnase de Nysa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of CanadaSame topicAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and HistoryFrench-language works237,207