Molecular cytogenetic characterization of an insertional translocation, ins(6;7)(p25;q33q34): Deletion/duplication of 7q33‐34 and clinical correlations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A balanced insertional translocation between chromosomes 6 and 7, ins(6;7)(p25;q33q34) has been extensively investigated. The insertional translocation was found in several members of a three-generation family, where some were healthy balanced carriers while others had clinical symptoms due to deletion or duplication of 7q33-34. The deleted/duplicated segment could only be detected using high resolution banding and fluorescent in situ hybridization. A number of BAC/PAC clones located on chromosome 6 and 7 were used to characterize the breakpoint regions in detail and to determine the size of the deletion, which was 7.6 Mb, containing up to 68 genes. However, the insert on chromosome 6 was only 7.4 Mb, due to a deletion of 227 kb at the distal breakpoint on 7q. This small deletion was also found in the "balanced" carriers, and although the chromosome segment contains at least eight genes, none of the carriers seem to be affected by haploinsufficiency, since the phenotype is apparently normal. This is the first detailed characterization and phenotype correlation of such a deletion/duplication of distal 7q.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".