MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089241886 · doi:10.1002/lsm.10014

Photodynamic therapy using Verteporfin (benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A, BPD‐MA) and 630 nm laser light in canine esophagus*

2002· article· en· W2089241886 on OpenAlexaff
Masoud Panjehpour, Robert C. DeNovo, Mark G. Petersen, Bergein F. Overholt, R. D. Bower, Valery Rubinchik, Barbara A. Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueLasers in Surgery and Medicine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsQLT (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVerteporfinPhotodynamic therapyMedicinePhotosensitizerEsophagusAblationNuclear medicineSurgeryOphthalmologyChemistryInternal medicineRetinalPhotochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Verteporfin is a new photosensitizer with short-term skin photosensitivity. The objective of this preclinical study was to find the light dose that effectively ablates canine esophageal mucosa when delivered 30 minutes after Verteporfin injection. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Verteporfin was administered intravenously (0.75 mg/kg). 630 nm light from KTP/Dye laser was delivered using an esophageal Photodynamic therapy (PDT) balloon. In Phase I study, animals were treated 30 minutes after drug injection using 40, 60, and 80 J/cm to find the desired light dose. Using results from phase I and application of reciprocity principle (light dose vs. plasma concentration of drug), additional light doses were calculated for delivery at other times. In phase II, animals were treated at 15, 60, and 120 minutes, using the calculated light doses of 60, 145, and 200 J/cm, respectively. Animals were followed for 2 days to 4 weeks. RESULTS: In Phase I, 80 J/cm at 30 minutes induced total mucosal ablation. In Phase II, light doses of 60, 145, and 200 J/cm induced similar mucosal injuries when delivered at 15, 60, and 120 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Effective mucosal ablation in canine esophagus was achieved using Verteporfin and 630 nm light doses of 60, 80, 145, and 200 J/cm when delivered at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after the drug injection, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLasers in Surgery and MedicineSame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207