MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089262716 · doi:10.1109/citres.2010.5619844

Analysis of spatial and seasonal distribution of power transmission line thermal aging

2010· article· en· W2089262716 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jana Heckenbergerová, Petr Musı́lek, Md. Mafijul Islam Bhuiyan, D. Koval

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission lineElectric power transmissionConductorElectrical conductorEnvironmental scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Power transmissionAsset managementElectrical engineeringPower (physics)EngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aging assessment of conductors and other components of electric power networks plays an important role in operation and asset management of power transmission systems. Conductors can lose their tensile strength due to the adverse effects of conductor aging caused by thermal overload, and subsequent annealing. This paper analyses seasonal dependency of the thermal aging using known characteristics of transmission conductor, along with load information and weather data. Weather conditions are derived from historical weather reanalysis and interpolated to locations of the transmission lines. By analyzing the conductor temperatures, aging due to loss of conductor tensile strength is estimated at individual locations along the transmission corridor. This paper is concerned with analysis of spatial distribution of thermal aging along the line for different seasons. The proposed methodology is illustrated using a case study analyzing a power transmission line in interior British Columbia, Canada. The simulation results show strong seasonal dependency of both, thermal aging and transmission capacity. This information is important for transmission network operating procedures, e.g. scheduling of line inspections, maintenance, or reconductoring, and for effective transmission asset management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThermal Analysis in Power TransmissionFrench-language works237,207