Group oriented interpersonal therapy reduced postpartum depression in women at risk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zlotnick C, Johnson SL, Miller IW , et al. Postpartum depression in women receiving public assistance: pilot study of an interpersonal-therapy-oriented group intervention. Am J Psychiatry2001 Apr; 158 : 638 –40 [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: Does a weekly 4 session group intervention based on the principles of interpersonal psychotherapy given to at risk pregnant women reduce the occurrence of postpartum major depression? Randomised (unclear allocation concealment*), unblinded*), controlled trial with follow up to 3 months after giving birth. Prenatal clinic at a general hospital in Providence, Rhode Island, USA. 37 pregnant women receiving public assistance who were at 20–32 weeks gestation and had ≥1 risk factor for postpartum depression (ie, a previous episode of depression or postpartum depression, mild to moderate levels of depressive symptoms, poor social support, or a life stressor within the previous 6 mo). … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DAmerican%2BJournal%2Bof%2BPsychiatry%26rft.stitle%253DAm.%2BJ.%2BPsychiatry%26rft.aulast%253DZlotnick%26rft.auinit1%253DC.%26rft.volume%253D158%26rft.issue%253D4%26rft.spage%253D638%26rft.epage%253D640%26rft.atitle%253DPostpartum%2BDepression%2Bin%2BWomen%2BReceiving%2BPublic%2BAssistance%253A%2BPilot%2BStudy%2Bof%2Ban%2BInterpersonal-Therapy-Oriented%2BGroup%2BIntervention%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1176%252Fappi.ajp.158.4.638%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11282702%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1176/appi.ajp.158.4.638&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=11282702&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmental%2F4%2F4%2F118.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000167931900020&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".