The Value of Radial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Abductor Digiti Minimi Release in Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, progressive disease characterized by destructive synovitis commonly involving the hand. Ulnar drift deformity has been reported in up to 30% of these patients. Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthroplasty with soft-tissue reconstruction was described to correct this deformity, but recurrence is a common problem. This is a retrospective study of 18 patients who underwent 96 primary index to little finger MCP joint arthroplasties in Montreal General Hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups. In group I, 60 MCP joints in 15 hands had silastic arthroplasty with radial collateral ligament reconstruction and abductor digiti minimi release. In group II, 36 MCP joints in 9 hands had silastic arthroplasty without soft-tissue reconstruction. All patients had the same postoperative rehabilitation, with a follow-up mean time of 63 months. Postoperative clinical and radiologic comparison was performed. Group I was found to have more severe wrist disease. No significant difference was seen between the 2 groups for ulnar drift (D2, P < 0.79; D3, P < 0.11; D4, P < 0.49; D5, P < 0.31), active range of motion, power grip, incidence of MCP subluxation, or functional ability. MCP arthroplasty with radial collateral ligament reconstruction and abductor digiti minimi release may recreate a short-term balance of forces around the MCP joint but does not prevent late postoperative deformity. This is a preliminary study with a small sample size but supported previous reports on MCP arthroplasty with soft-tissue reconstruction. Eighteen patients undergoing 96 primary index-to-little-finger MCP joint silastic arthroplasties were compared between those without soft tissue reconstruction and those with RCL reconstruction and abductor digiti minimi release. The latter group had a better short-term balance of forces around the MCP joint, but long-term results were equivalent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".