The Space Density of Redshift 5.7 Lyα Emitters: First Constraints from a Multislit Windows Search
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present results from a blind, spectroscopic search for redshift 5.7 Lyα emission-line galaxies at Keck I. Using a band-limiting filter and custom slit mask, we cover the LRIS detector with low-resolution spectra in the 8100-8250 Å atmospheric window, which contains no bright night-sky emission lines. We find nine objects with line fluxes greater than our flux limit of 6 × 10 -18 ergs s -1 cm -2 in our ~5.1 arcmin 2 field. We rule out a Lyα identification for six of these based on the absence of the continuum break, expected at rest 1215 Å for high- z galaxies and/or the identification of additional emission lines in our follow-up spectra. We find that extremely metal-poor, foreground emission-line galaxies are the most difficult type of interloper to recognize. For the three remaining emission-line objects, we identify a plausible counterpart for each object in a deep V -band image of the field, suggesting that none of them has a continuum break in the i band. Our preliminary conclusion is that our field contains no z = 5.7 Lyα emitters brighter than 0.6 L , where L ≡ 3.26 × 10 42 ergs s -1 . Selecting a field with zero Lyα emitters is marginally consistent with the no-evolution hypothesis—i.e., we expected to recover 2-3 Lyα emitters, assuming that the Lyα luminosity function at redshift 5.7 is the same as it is at redshift 3. Our null result rules out a brightening of L by more than a factor of 1.7 from redshift 3 to 5.7, or, over the same redshift interval, an increase of more than a factor of 2.2 in the number density of Lyα emitters. The paucity of z = 5.7 Lyα emitters raises the question of whether the Lyα-selected population plays a significant role in maintaining the ionization of the intergalactic medium (IGM) at z = 5.7. We find that if the escape fraction of Lyα radiation is less than 0.4 f Lyc , where f Lyc is the escape fraction of Lyman continuum photons, then the star formation rate in the Lyα-emitting population is high enough in the no-evolution model (our upper limit) to maintain the ionization of the IGM at z = 5.7.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".